A little while back, the California Association of Bicycling Organizations people discussed this article in The Inland Daily Bulletin in which columnist Michelle Pearl asks the local CHP for the Final Word on traffic law for cyclists. A retired police officer "took umbrage" at an earlier statement about the legality of riding side by side on California roads, so the CHP asked Pearl to "run a correction" that turns out to contain patently untrue information.
In spite of what the law clearly states, however, "be prepared," as San Diego Bike Coalition board member Jim Baross writes, "to hear otherwise from your friendly cop on the street. It is not a good idea to try to argue on the spot with police folks. Take notes and deal later with a superior officer if possible."
IMPORTANT: Please post comments for this article at the new CYCLELICIOUS 2.0 version of this page.
I have never met a police officer who knows much about cycling laws but are quick to recommend "solutions" (typically not in conformity with moving vehicle laws). What's new?
Superior officers seem more concerned with protecting the reputation of their officers, not confessing to improper training.
At the end of the line just hope that a judge cares more about dismissing a case then to be educated. Cultural biases run deep. Jack