Some of you might remember my ruminations on the carbon footprint of blogging. I never even thought, however, of the carbon footprint of spam -- the unsolicited untargeted ads broadcast via email and social networks. It turns out that anti virus vendor McAfee commissioned a study to calculate the energy cost of sending and receiving spam. According to McAfee's report on the carbon footprint of spam email:
An estimated worldwide total of 62 trillion spam emails were sent in 2008.
Global annual spam energy use totals 33 billion kilowatt-hours (KWh), or 33 terawatt hours (TWh). That’s equivalent to the electricity used in 2.4 million homes in the United States, with the same GHG emissions as 3.1 million passenger cars using two billion United States gallons of gasoline.
The average GHG emission associated with a single spam message is 0.3 grams of CO2. That’s like driving three feet (one meter) in equivalent emissions, but when multiplied by the annual volume of spam, it’s like driving around the Earth 1.6 million times.
On November 11, 2008, McColo Inc., a United States-based web hosting provider notorious for its prolific contribution to email spam, was taken offline by its upstream Internet Service Provider (ISP). Overnight, global spam volume dropped by 70 percent. The energy saved in the ensuing lull — before spammers rebuilt their sending capacity — equated to taking 2.2 million cars off the road.
I'm a long time participant in Project Honeypot, which works to identify email address harvesters and spam senders by posting "honeypot" email addresses and mail servers, kind of like bait cars used in sting operations to find car thieves.
IMPORTANT: Please post comments for this article at the new CYCLELICIOUS 2.0 version of this page.
"62 trillion spam emails were sent in 2008" I don't know where that data came from because it's blatantly wrong. I get at least 38 kagillion myself which extrapolates to 14 googolplex for the worldwide number.