To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
1,100 cyclist deaths with – what? – maybe a total population of 150 million? We have a larger population now and fewer cyclist deaths. Should we infer that cycling is now safer that it was in the 1940s, and if so, what causative factor explains the difference?
1,100 cyclist deaths with – what? – maybe a total population of 150 million? We have a larger population now and fewer cyclist deaths. Should we infer that cycling is now safer that it was in the 1940s, and if so, what causative factor explains the difference?
I noticed that also, Ed. We have more than twice the population and a little more than half the cyclist deaths.
Besides improved traffic safety, maybe there were four or five times as many cyclists?
I noticed that also, Ed. We have more than twice the population and a little more than half the cyclist deaths. Besides improved traffic safety, maybe there were four or five times as many cyclists?
Hi Richard,
You may be interested in two vintage Times-Call articles from Longmont that I've recently posted:
http://longmontian.blogspot.com/2007/10/vintage-longmont-bicycle-newspaper.html
Hi Richard,You may be interested in two vintage Times-Call articles from Longmont that I've recently posted:http://longmontian.blogspot.com/2007/10/vintage-longmont-bicycle-newspaper.html
Thanks, Van. Very interesting.
Thanks, Van. Very interesting.