To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Is the fork mounted backwards on purpose so that nobody will steal their advertisement?
Is the fork mounted backwards on purpose so that nobody will steal their advertisement?
It irks me soooo much that that fork is on backwards! It's the first thing I noticed and that alone would make me avoid DKNY stuff from now on.
It irks me soooo much that that fork is on backwards! It's the first thing I noticed and that alone would make me avoid DKNY stuff from now on.
It irks me soooo much that that fork is on backwards! It's the first thing I noticed and that alone would make me avoid DKNY stuff from now on.
Maybe the stem is mounted backwards to accomodate somebody with T-Rex-like arms?
Maybe the stem is mounted backwards to accomodate somebody with T-Rex-like arms?
I'm sure the paint on the chain, gears, etc. must really help too!
I'm sure the paint on the chain, gears, etc. must really help too!
I'm sure the paint on the chain, gears, etc. must really help too!
…"Hey, don't get your new DKNY knickers in the proverbial knot. My crack research staff ascertained the Brits drive on the wrong side of the road & thought these bikes would compensate. These kids used to be NYC bike messengers, so they don't know bikes like me."…
signed: Donna 'Kilo TT' Karan
…"Hey, don't get your new DKNY knickers in the proverbial knot. My crack research staff ascertained the Brits drive on the wrong side of the road & thought these bikes would compensate. These kids used to be NYC bike messengers, so they don't know bikes like me."…signed: Donna 'Kilo TT' Karan
…"Hey, don't get your new DKNY knickers in the proverbial knot. My crack research staff ascertained the Brits drive on the wrong side of the road & thought these bikes would compensate. These kids used to be NYC bike messengers, so they don't know bikes like me."…signed: Donna 'Kilo TT' Karan
Bananarent had bikes chained – without permission to LBK&C bike racks to operate their hire service and eventually got served with an ASBO. Like NYC this is a blatant flouting of laws against fly-posting so Westminster Council could take out an ASBO against DKNY, or perhaps even clas this as fly-posting which could carry a fine for each offence (anyone done a bike count?).
The practice gets parked bikes a bad name and blocks space for bona fide cyclists to park
With no brakes the other risk is that someone might actual;ly try an steal one of the bikes and ride it (in that state) so there is also a corporate liability
Given the lack of decent cycle parking on-street in London the more astute PR person would have looked at ways to 'sponsor' cycle parking which would have given a far better result in public image – thay mighte also have looked at the move by HSBC in France and the Copenhagen City Cycles to support the City Bike scheme by 'branding the fleet – Copenhagen has a tariff of branding blocks of their 2500 bike fleet, which is run as a not-for-profit operation using work skills trainees to maintain the bikes and rebuilding the machines every year (some of the bikes are over 12 years old) so they run a scheme which has 50% more bikes per sq km than Paris, which are used up to 15 times per bike per day (Paris is about 5 times per bike per day). I think the income to support the Copenhagen scheme is around DKr 2m per year if they sell all the space.
May all your rides be downhill with a following wind..
A V Lowe and B C Klett
Bananarent had bikes chained – without permission to LBK&C bike racks to operate their hire service and eventually got served with an ASBO. Like NYC this is a blatant flouting of laws against fly-posting so Westminster Council could take out an ASBO against DKNY, or perhaps even clas this as fly-posting which could carry a fine for each offence (anyone done a bike count?).The practice gets parked bikes a bad name and blocks space for bona fide cyclists to parkWith no brakes the other risk is that someone might actual;ly try an steal one of the bikes and ride it (in that state) so there is also a corporate liabilityGiven the lack of decent cycle parking on-street in London the more astute PR person would have looked at ways to 'sponsor' cycle parking which would have given a far better result in public image – thay mighte also have looked at the move by HSBC in France and the Copenhagen City Cycles to support the City Bike scheme by 'branding the fleet – Copenhagen has a tariff of branding blocks of their 2500 bike fleet, which is run as a not-for-profit operation using work skills trainees to maintain the bikes and rebuilding the machines every year (some of the bikes are over 12 years old) so they run a scheme which has 50% more bikes per sq km than Paris, which are used up to 15 times per bike per day (Paris is about 5 times per bike per day). I think the income to support the Copenhagen scheme is around DKr 2m per year if they sell all the space.May all your rides be downhill with a following wind..A V Lowe and B C Klett
Bananarent had bikes chained – without permission to LBK&C bike racks to operate their hire service and eventually got served with an ASBO. Like NYC this is a blatant flouting of laws against fly-posting so Westminster Council could take out an ASBO against DKNY, or perhaps even clas this as fly-posting which could carry a fine for each offence (anyone done a bike count?).The practice gets parked bikes a bad name and blocks space for bona fide cyclists to parkWith no brakes the other risk is that someone might actual;ly try an steal one of the bikes and ride it (in that state) so there is also a corporate liabilityGiven the lack of decent cycle parking on-street in London the more astute PR person would have looked at ways to 'sponsor' cycle parking which would have given a far better result in public image – thay mighte also have looked at the move by HSBC in France and the Copenhagen City Cycles to support the City Bike scheme by 'branding the fleet – Copenhagen has a tariff of branding blocks of their 2500 bike fleet, which is run as a not-for-profit operation using work skills trainees to maintain the bikes and rebuilding the machines every year (some of the bikes are over 12 years old) so they run a scheme which has 50% more bikes per sq km than Paris, which are used up to 15 times per bike per day (Paris is about 5 times per bike per day). I think the income to support the Copenhagen scheme is around DKr 2m per year if they sell all the space.May all your rides be downhill with a following wind..A V Lowe and B C Klett