Category: Uncategorized

Follow Friday: The cost of driving

Happy Friday, all. I totally missed it’s Friday the 13th until I saw this comment.

Steve in Chicago posted thoughts and photos of damage caused by car wrecks, especially when those cars run into bike facilities. He’s asked for more photos of auto imposition, so I sent him this.

City crew replacing damaged street sign

That sign might have cost roughly $500 to replace, but this stuff adds up. There are about 6.4 million car crashes annually in the United States. Beyond the human cost of 2.9 million injuries and 40,000 deaths from these crashes, there’s a direct financial impact of $230 billion.


Rich Risemburg in Los Angeles looks at the financial benefits to commuters and businesses when you encourage cycling in Bucking the Cycle.

Is car sharing good for cities?

It’s the Department of TRANSPORTATION, not the Department of Cars.

One of many 2010 Bike Ladies Calendars.

Have a great weekend! I’ll be at the south Branci40 Dr entry of Delaveaga Park in Santa Cruz 10 AM Saturday morning if you want to say hello.

More Federal dollars for bike projects

Federal Transit Agency seeks public comment on proposed policy change for pedestrian and bicycle access projects

Local governments can apply to several programs administered by the U.S. Federal Transit Agency (FTA) to improve pedestrian and cyclist access to transit centers. Under Federal law, any capital project to enhance pedestrian and bicycle access must have a “physical or functional relationship” to the transit center.

Bike lane placement

FTA guidelines for these types of programs are vague, but a standard of 1,500 feet is generally applied — any project more than 1,500 feet away from a transit stop or station is currently not eligible. For many large stations, that barely gets you into the parking lot. The FTA now acknowledges, however, that this 1,500 distance is too short. According to the FTA, research shows people are willing to travel about 15 minutes to their bus stop or station. That equates to about 1/2 mile for walking and three miles bicycling.

The FTA proposes to expand the radius they’ll consider for grant requests: pedestrian projects can be up to 1/2 mile away; bicycle projects can be up to three miles from the transit center to receive Federal Transit capital grants. That could potentially make almost every bike facilities project in the San Francisco Bay Area eligible for FTA grant funding.

The FTA proposed this change after Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood challenged the Department of Transportation to improve the livability of our nation’s communities. A livable community, according to LaHood, is “a community where if people don’t want an automobile, they don’t have to have one; a community where you can walk to work, your doctor’s appointment, pharmacy or grocery store. Or you could take light rail, a bus, or ride a bike.” According to Secretary LaHood, “livable communities are mixed-use neighborhoods with highly-connected streets promoting mobility for all users, whether they are children walking or biking to school or commuters riding transit or driving motor vehicles.
Benefits include improved traffic flow, shorter trip lengths, safer streets for pedestrians and cyclists, lower greenhouse gas emissions, reduced dependence on fossil fuels, increased trip-chaining, and independence for those who prefer not to or are unable to drive. In addition, investing in a ‘complete street’ concept stimulates private-sector economic activity by increasing the viability of street-level retail small businesses and professional services, creating housing opportunities and extending the usefulness of school and transit facilities.”

To view the entire proposal and submit your comment electronically, visit regulations.gov. If this link doesn’t take you directly to the proposal, search for “FTA-2009-0052.”

Props to Nate Baird.

Bike Video: 30 Seconds to Mars – The Ride

Remember when 30 Seconds to Mars asked for cyclists to show up for a video shoot in Los Angeles? Remember when we all wondered if Jared Leto rides a fixed gear bike?

Well, now we know — it’s a freewheeling singlespeed.

“The Ride” by 30 Seconds to Mars.

The blinky lights are really cool, especially in the tunnel. Now if only I knew what the lyrics, the music, the song, the random imagery of cyclists, horses, fires, and the wreck are all supposed to mean. Enjoy!

Update: And I just noticed BSNYC already posted about this video. I need to move to the east coast!

Bicycles, crime shows and murder

The other day on the train my friends and I talked about this week’s episode of Castle in which a mystery writer and homicide detective team up to solve the murder of the week.

“Kill the Messenger,” (clever title, eh?) begins with an erstwhile bike messenger in really nice duds and a brand new Timbuk2 Commute 2.0 bag crazily riding against traffic. A guy in a black car whacks the poor messenger. You know it’s a murder because (a) the driver is wearing a mask; (b) the driver steals the Timbuk2 Commute 2.0 bag from the messenger’s body; and (c) the homicide detectives shows up!

This is a completely unbelievable scenario, of course. Any competent criminal knows the easiest way to kill somebody without risk of investigation is to run him over with a car. The silly mask looks a little suspicious, but I doubt anybody would have noticed the bad guy pilfering the bag.

Compare to a recent episode of Psych, in which a daily bike commuter is apparently run over by a car.

In “High Top Fade Out” the police dismiss the crime as a vehicular hit and run and everybody assumes the driver will never be found. The diligence of the victim’s close friends, however, uncovers evidence of foul play!

Which do you think is more believable and realistic? The Castle scenario in which the homicide cops immediately jump on the case and investigate a murder? Or the Psych story in which the cyclist is just a poor schmuck who got in the way of a car, and the police ignore the death because they consider investigating “accidents” as a superfluous waste of their time?