Category: Musings

About that Bolivian mandatory bicycle law

Road.cc’s story about a mandatory bicycle law in Bolivia’s fourth largest city is making the rounds in various social media forums after this Spanish language editorial landed on Reddit.

The gist of the editorial: Councillor Beatriz Zegarra for the city of Cochabamba, Bolivia introduced a proposal to mandate bicycle use at least one day per week for city residents to reduce pollution and preserve the Corazón de la Madre Tierra. Zegarra’s proposal has gone through the city’s urban development committee (“Comision Segundo“) and apparently moves on for full council consideration sometime soon, although it’s not on the agenda for tonight’s city council agenda.

(more…)

Veggies Tales: Gated Community

Happy Sunday. It’s time for my weekly homily.

Anthony has been hosting an online book club discussion of Dr Jason Henderson’s book Street Fight, on the history of transportation politics in San Francisco.

Last week’s discussion centered on the three broad ideologies that inform the views of mobility politics in San Francisco. According to Henderson, progressives approach the world through empathy-based values and are most willing to radically challenge the status quo to address problems like environmental degradation and economic inequality. San Francisco progressives are most likely to directly challenge the idea that automobiles are an essential and inevitable part of any transportation network.

Henderson classifies his second group as neoliberals, who participate in laissez-faire capitalism and desire transportation systems that maximize their accumulation of wealth. They understand the limits of automobility in terms of environmental damage, congestion, resource unavailability, and practicality for sustained profit. They want to steer the transportation debate in ways that grow their financial capital and investments. I suspect most readers of Cyclelicious identify most closely with the neoliberal classification: you believe climate change has the potential to wreck modern financial systems and we talk about studies showing increased retails sales when bike lanes replace car parking. We want good transit and bike facilities to get us to our jobs, reduce the external costs imposed by out-of-control car traffic, and increase the value of our property after the white stripes of gentrification transform blight into a desirable neighborhood.

Finally, Henderson notes a pronounced conservative discourse in San Francisco’s politics of mobility. The first freeway revolt was not driven primarily by the progressive ideology of livability, but by middle class home owners who feared falling property values if a freeway came through their neighborhood. The axiom that automobiles are necessary for commerce and family transportation is also at the heart of modern day opposition to parking removal and lane restrictions.

Conservatives put more emphasis on individual responsibility. Automobile ownership fits well with the conservative philosophy of individualism and direct personal responsibility. I’ve argued that the bicycle is even more individualistic than the automobile, but another aspect of conservative thought — that individuals should insulate themselves from the greater society into their own families, churches and clubs of like-minded people — further encourages individuals cocoon themselves in their “cages,” as some cyclists disparagingly refer to cars and SUVs.

All of this reminded me of a gentle poke that the Christian creators of Veggie Tales made toward this insulation from the world in the song “Gated Community.” Enjoy.



Remembering Ken Kifer

10 years ago tomorrow, we lost Ken Kifer, a tireless advocate of human powered transportation. As one of the more prolific and inspirational writers of the Internet cycling world, his loss at the hands of drunk driver Jimmy Don Rodgers on an Alabama highway shocked and saddened the cycling world.

To this day I think we’re a little bit poorer for Kifer’s untimely passing from this world, and we’re a little bit richer from his contributions.

His website was a treasure trove of information. Although his domain finally went dark about a year and a half ago, you can find a the full archive over at Phred.org. If you’ve never heard of Ken Kifer or read his material before, I recommend an evening of browsing through his material.

Suicide Swerve

Last night, Ted and I discussed this unlikely report of a cyclist’s accidental death. The cyclist, 20 year old Justin Price, was riding to work in the shoulder when, according to witnesses, he suddenly swerved into the side of a passing tractor trailer. Although the truck driver, Kerry Williams, heroically tried to avoid Price, Price hit the truck. Price bounced off of the side of the truck, but he apparently didn’t have enough — police say Price swerved back to the truck again, after which he, sadly, perished after he ended up under the trailer.

Anybody who reads news accounts of road cycling traffic collisions frequently find mention of these inexplicable “suicide swerves,” in which the hapless driver is just driving along when that maniac on a bike inexplicably swerves right into the car.

Those who share the road with traffic realize what probably happened: the motorist passed with inches to spare, or they move over a little to pass but then merge right into the cyclist’s space on the road before the pass is complete. In either case, the results can be tragic for the cyclist, even if the cyclist did everything right.

Amelie Le Moullac was killed two weeks ago when, according to those with the windshield perpsective, she “swerved” into the side of a truck in San Francisco. The presumption of guilt on the cyclist has prompted local bike advocates heap heavy criticism on the SFPD for their cursory investigation. In Santa Cruz, the police reported a cyclist swerved into a passing gravel truck in 2007, when the accident reconstruction for the subsequent civil suit showed the truck driver likely hit the cyclist in this fatal collision.

Because these reports putting blame on the cyclist are so common, many people — Ted and I included — sardonically refer to these reports as a “suicide swerve.” A subset of these — the infamous “Single Witness Suicide Swerve” or SWSS — comes from the days of Usenet and possibly predates even that. The SWSS refers to a crash with a single surviving witness — the driver of the motor vehicle — who swears to a credulous investigator that the cyclist just swerved right in front of the driver. The presumption of guilt on the cyclist is reflected even in our traffic collision statistics, which show a majority of bike-vs-car collisions are caused by the cyclist.

During this online discussion, we discovered some people take exception to our use of the word “suicide.” Suicide is, after all, a serious and sensitive topic for many people, and some thought the term was used as click bait. We explained the usage, however, and our friends understood. Most cyclists probably don’t have a death wish, but just want to get from point A to B. The idea that cyclists intentionally swerve into the sides of passing trucks is, frankly, offensive, yet many investigators seem to believe that’s how we behave.

Yes, there’s stupid behavior that will kill you, and I’ve seen plenty of it in my part of California. I’ve watched cyclists try to squeeze into a too small space on the road, and I’ve occasionally been the idiot party myself, both on bike and in the car. I’d wager, however, that many “swerves into traffic” are instances where a passing driver doesn’t have room to pass, or passes with only inches to spare while expecting superhuman agility on the part of the cyclist to hold his line.

I applaud the San Francisco Bicycle Coalition demands for better investigations of bicycle fatalities in their city.