Category: news

Two cyclist deaths in SF yesterday, another in Pleasanton this morning

Two women were killed while riding bikes in separate hit-and-run collisions in San Francisco yesterday, June 22, 2016. Details and discussion are in this Hoodline summary that collects statements from police, various news sources and a reddit conversation, but the gist of it:

  • Victim #1 in SoMa at 7th and Howard: woman in her 20s was hit by a driver traveling at high speed who ran a red light. Driver fled the scene but was caught by police. Witness says the driver was “definitely not sober.”
  • Victim #2 in Golden Gate Park: woman in her 40s hit by a driver traveling between 50 and 60 MPH on John F Kennedy Drive. The driver fled; vehicle has been located but not the driver. Here’s a view of westbound JFK approaching the location where the collision occurred.

Also, this morning, a woman in the East Bay town of Pleasanton, CA in Alameda County was killed while riding her bicycle across the intersection of Bernal and Stanley. This is a huge, multiple lane intersection. There’s no word on who ran the red light that controls this intersection, but the “the driver is cooperating with the investigation” while the cyclist is, of course, unable to give her statement.

Valley, Bernal and Stanley, Pleasanton, CA

Via Murph and others for this sad news.

Kalamazoo: My reaction, press reaction, your reaction

Last night’s tragic news of a five people killed by a maniac behind the wheels of a Chevy pickup truck on a rural road north of Kalamazoo, Michigan continues to dominate social media. County attorney Jeff Getting and Michigan Governor Rick Snyder expressed their condolences and promised to fully investigate and prosecute the 50-year-old man who allegedly ran down the group.

For those who haven’t hard yet, police across three different counties began receiving calls about a reckless driver. Shortly after 6:30 P.M., this driver caught up to a group bike ride on the 5500 block of Westnedge Road north of Kalamazoo, Michigan. Media reports indicate the Chevy truck “looked like it hit a brick wall.” Police caught the alleged driver fleeing on foot. Five of the cyclists perished by the time medical help arrived, and another four remain hospitalized with serious to critical injuries.

Media response has been sympathetic to the cyclists, as have statements from local and state officials. Media and police all report the cyclists were riding uphill in the shoulder of a straight, rural road, and that the unnamed Chevy driver slammed into them at high speed in the shoulder.

Both the media and local officials have made parallels with last February’s shootings during which Uber driver Jason Dalton allegedly shot and killed six people and injured another two. Dalton claims the Devil manifested himself through the Uber app and forced Dalton to commit the murders.

Media, for the most part, have avoided calling this an “accident.” One notable exception was the Atlantic, which is ordinarily pretty good about such things. The Atlantic later changed their headline after several people called them out on this language.

I’d also hope that a “director of road safety” for a large cycling club would be aware of the national discussion regarding “accidents” and traffic safety, but I know from personal experience that one doesn’t always think and speak clearly when ambushed by media immediately after a tragedy like this.

safety is no accident

The reader comments following these news media reports seem more sympathetic than usual, though, naturally, the dregs of humanity feel compelled to contribute their sociopathic stupidity about licensing cyclists and worse. I was a little discouraged to see victim-blaming coming from one of our own, however, in a story that mostly did a decent job fitting this crash into a wider narrative about cyclist safety.

Bob Strader - cyclist safety Kalamazoo

He appears to put the onus of safety on the more vulnerable road user even as he tries to make some sense of this tragedy. After discussion with others, I’ve reconsidered my opinion of Strader’s comments. I’ve made similar comments about my personal preferences on local roads after reports of crashes and close calls, while maintaining that cyclists have full rights to use these public roads.

The 5500 block of North Westnedge Avenue looks like this:

5500 North Westnedge Avenue

There is absolutely no excuse for that Chevy truck driver not to have seen a large group of people on bikes, regardless of their position or even their choice to use this road.

About two dozen people lose their lives each year while riding a bicycle in Michigan. I imagine those closest to the scene of this mass casualty are in a state of shock. My sincere condolences to them, with hopes for real change in all our attitudes about road safety. Sorry for the sloppiness of my stream-of-consciousness narrative, but this it’s always difficult to get a handle on incidents like this.

SF Bay Area: Spare the Air forecast for Thursday, June 2 2016

Happy first day of the meteorological summer. The Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) announced its first summertime Spare the Air Alert for 2016. Because ground-level ozone is forecast to be at unhealthy levels tomorrow, the BAAQMD advises you to avoid “vigorous outdoor exercise” to limit your exposure, while also asking you to take one for the team when you “bike to work or around town” to help prevent smog.

ozone

A Spare the Air Alert is in effect, Thursday, June 2 in the San Francisco Bay Area. Concentrations of ground-level ozone pollution are forecast to be unhealthy tomorrow. Residents are encouraged to drive less and reduce their energy use tomorrow and every day so pollution levels are lower, preventing health alerts when temperatures are high. To help prevent smog this summer, please: – Bike to work or around town – Take public transit – Telecommute – Carpool and link your errands to reduce driving – Avoid using gas-powered lawn mowers and leaf blowers – Reduce household energy use – Don’t use lighter fluid on the barbecue – Avoid using aerosol spray cleaners, paints and hairspray High levels of ozone pollution are particularly harmful for young children, seniors and those with respiratory and heart conditions. Vigorous outdoor exercise should be undertaken only in the early morning hours when ozone concentrations are lower. To plan your commute online, visit 511.org. To monitor current air quality conditions, visit sparetheair.org Download the FREE Spare the Air iPhone or Android application at sparetheair.org for alert notifications, local air quality forecasts, podcasts and several tools to help reduce air pollution! This AirAlert is provided by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. Thank you for doing your part to Spare the Air! Employers with 50 or more full-time employees in the Bay Area are now required to offer commuter benefits to their employees. To find out how you could save money by using commuter benefits, visit commuterbenefits.511.org.

San Jose: Bike lanes proposed for Moorpark Ave, Winchester Blvd

A long stretch of Moorpark Avenue and a short segment of Winchester Boulevard are scheduled for repaving as part of the city of San Jose Pavement Maintenance Program. When streets are re-paved, the San Jose Department of Transportation also looks for opportunities to implement city policies related to elements of the General Plan and Vision Zero.

To that end, the San Jose Department of Transportation proposes new bike lanes for portions of Moorpark Avenue and Winchester Boulevard.

SJ DOT: Winchester Blvd Restripe proposal

Winchester Boulevard

DOT plans to add six foot bike lanes to either side of Winchester Boulevard along Santana Row and the Winchester Mystery House when they re-pave this road between Stevens Creek Boulevard and Tisch Way just north of I-280. The city will retain traffic capacity on the existing six lanes by reducing the lane width to current city standards.

Winchester is important because it’s a major north-south street providing access between residential and a huge commercial district in San Jose.

Moorpark Avenue

Moorpark is a little more … interesting. Most of the discussion at this meeting centered around Moorpark because some parking and a turning lane will be removed. The current configuration is five lanes: two eastbound, two westbound, and a center turn lane with pocket turns at major intersections. Street parking is available for the homes in the eastbound direction. The westbound direction is bounded by the I-280 sound wall.

DOT proposes reducing lane width and removing the center turn lane to make room for buffered bike lanes on both sides of Moorpark, resulting in two westbound lanes, two eastbound lanes, and a lane of curbside parking. In the Streetmix view below, you’re looking east.

SJ DOT: Moorpark Ave restriping proposal

SJDOT says modeling shows center turn lane removal will have no impact on traffic capacity, although it will delay people turning onto minor streets and driveways. At intersections, the pocket turn lanes will remain, so intersection level of service will remain the same. Of the thousands of street parking spaces available on eastbound Moorpark, up to 30 will be removed for daylighting to improve sight lines at uncontrolled intersections.

Traffic safety is currently pretty horrendous on Moorpark because the current lane configuration encourages speeding in spite of numerous intersections with poor sightlines. The narrower lanes should encourage safer driving behavior.

San Jose lacks east-west corridors for cycling, and adding Moorpark improves this east-west connectivity.

Complainers and Explainers

In spite of the less than trivial traffic impacts, of course some of the neighborhood wags showed up to complain, because change is horrible. In the approximate order I heard them:

  • “Bikes impede traffic!” You can see how badly bikes impede traffic in this video I shot while biking to this meeting.

  • In the very next breath, “I never see anybody use the existing bike lanes.”
  • Then, “Who’s crazy enough to bike around here? You’re taking your life in your hands?” The whole point of the project is to improve subjective and objective safety for people who want to ride bikes to the numerous destinations on Winchester and Moorpark.

Other notes:

  • When SJ DOT bike/ped planner John Brazil mentioned the city’s goal of increasing bike mode from its current one percent to 20 percent, the wags tittered loudly like poorly behaved bullying buttheads. Bikes outnumbered cars at this meeting, although “nobody rides bikes” in San Jose.
  • The demographic most likely to die in a traffic collision on surface streets in West San Jose are people over the age of 65, which closely matches the demographic opposed to bike lanes at this meeting. These folks are losing their eyesight and there will come a day when they lose their driving privileges, regardless of legacy policies that force everyone to drive whether they want to or not. Nevertheless, they still need to visit the grocery store, ophthalmologist, endocrinologist, and kidney dialysis center.
  • Most humorous question (regarding a proposed left turn lane on westbound Moorpark): “Why would anyone want to turn left here?” John Brazil’s completely straight faced answer, “People sometimes like to go home.”
  • Moorpark traffic volume between Saratoga and San Tomas is 16,000 vehicles per day, which is right at the threshold of what three lanes can handle. Between San Tomas and Winchester, Moorpark needs the four lanes to handle the 24,000 vehicles per day that travel this segment. It’s worth noting that significant traffic is generated by people trying to bypass congestion on I-280.