Author: Richard Masoner

California Central Coast, single file riding, and the 3 foot law

Remember way back in 2012 when Governor Jerry Brown vetoed California’s second attempt at a three foot passing law? That version of the bill included a provision allowing passing drivers to cross the double yellow line on substandard lane widths when it’s safe to do so, as demonstrated by the passing Nissan SUV in the photo below.

Change lanes to pass

This works because the warrants for no-passing zones are based on sight distances at typical motoring speeds. You might need 200 yards of lane to pass a 12 foot long pickup truck + 18 foot horse trailer traveling 35 MPH and you’re trying to go 40. If I’m pushing my 60 inch long bicycle uphill at 10 MPH, however, you’re over and around in under 20 yards.

CHP opposed this bill because (they say) of this yellow line exception. Brown eventually signed the 2013 followup, AB 1371, which removed the yellow line exception. Ever since then, CHP has passive-aggressively indicated their dislike for the 3 foot passing law in statements to journalists highlighting motorist inconvenience and even the supposed danger created by this law, without any regard to cyclist safety.

The latest example comes from San Luis Obispo, CA, when the CHP Coastal Division PIO Officer Pat Seebart repeated the standard CHP mantra that “We can’t force somebody to break one law to obey another one” and that crossing the double solid yellow is illegal, no questions asked. Never mind that Central Coast law enforcement routinely look the other way when motorists cross the double yellow line when they need to get around elephant seals basking on the side of Highway 1, or when frequent rock slides, fallen trees, roadway flooding or disabled vehicles temporarily obstruct a lane. They’d consider you crazy and weird if you steadfastly insist on strict adherence to CVC 21460 in situations like this. Because many in CHP leadership dislike the 3 foot law, though, they do this silly, underhanded “Golly, shucks, we’re just enforcing the law as it’s written, blame the All Power Bike Lobby if you don’t like it” EVEN THOUGH THE YELLOW LINE EXCEPTION WAS REMOVED BECAUSE CHP DEMANDED ITS REMOVAL.

The story credulously also repeats the myth that riders in California must ride single file in wide bike lanes and shoulders, although no such law exists. The California Bicycle Coalition worked with Assembly Member Ting on AB 2509, which would clarify CVC 21202 — California’s “as far right as practicable” law — to allow side-by-side riding along and strengthen provisions for vehicular-style lane control. Discussions at the state capital, though, revealed widespread misunderstandings about cyclist rights on the road, so efforts to pass AB 2509 have been shelved for now even as advocates work to educate leaders in law enforcement and roadway construction on the benefits for all road users when cyclists get a smidgen of equity on public roads.

The journalist, Kathe Tanner, seems to sound like she’s kinda sorta trying to be fair, but she clearly writes from a windshield perspective. I was going to fault her for failing to get the cyclists’ perspective on these issues, but it’s plausible she reached out and didn’t get a response. Bike SLO County has never responded to my own inquiries regarding Central Coast cycling issues. A couple of folks associated with the San Luis Obispo Bicycle Club have responded after a day or two, but they’re a riding club, not an advocacy group. UPDATE: I was wrong — BikeSLOCounty has indeed responded to my inquiries, and I apologize to them for my faulty recollection. I’ve also been told the journalist reached out to unnamed “noted cyclists,” but the local advocacy group wasn’t among them.

In the future, I ask her and other SLO County reporters to contact the California Association of Bicycle Organizations and the California Bicycle Coalition if you’d like a fair and balanced treatment of any issues that might involve cyclists. CABO in particular has been paying close attention to the Central Coast lately because of some local airheadedness from the Caltrans District here.

With a tip of the hat to Cyclelicious reader Wendy D from Marina, CA for this.

San Jose traffic alert for an MLM event

VTA warns of transit and traffic delays for the downtown San Jose area this Friday morning, June 24, 2016, when 14,000 people will arrive to fill up the 6,000 available parking spaces within a half mile of the SAP Center for ACN, Inc’s international training event.

This volume of people traveling to the SAP Center isn’t unusual, but they’re usually filing in for an evening game or concert just as everyone else leaves their offices. On Friday, these multi-level marketing agents begin arriving at 7 A.M., at about the same time train passengers are circling for parking spaces at the large transit center across the street from the SAP Center, and office workers are filling up downtown parking garages.

Bike share riders San Jose

VTA says to expect traffic congestion on Route 87, at the Santa Clara and Julian exits, and on City streets surrounding the SAP Center area. Bus riders headed to the transit center and all around downtown should expect delays as well. I’ll try to remember to bring my camera on Friday to document the fun as I ride my bike through the mess.

VTA recommends public transportation: Bus, Lightrail, or Caltrain. The free DASH shuttle connects San Jose Diridon station and VTA Lightrail stations to various Downtown parking lots and office buildings. VTA does’t mention bikes, or skateboards, or scooters, or even the public bike-share system covering downtown San Jose with a station directly at the SAP Center. I’ll ask my bicycle rickshaw buddies if they plan to run their pedicabs on Friday morning.

Hydrate or die?

Happy first day of summer, all. I normally poo poo some of the fear-based marketing associated with hydration for outdoor enthusiasts, but biking in 120° Fahrenheit (50° C) weather is no joke.

Handy dandy water spigot on the drinking fountain  #ucsc #rer #rideeveryroad

Of the five heat-related fatalities reported since the weekend in Arizona, one was a mountain biker and another was a hiker, all of whom ran out of water miles from the trailhead.

How do you know if you’ve overdone it? Sports physicians recommend weighing yourself before and after your activity to determine water loss. If you lose 2% to 3% of your body weight during the workout, drink more water. If you lose between 4% to 6% of your body weight in water, you need to slow down and reduce the intensity of your workout. 7% and above, and you should call the doctor. Since carrying a scale into the front country might be inconvenient, you should perhaps stay close to civilization until you know how much your body can handle on an extremely hot day.

It’s possible to swing the pendulum too far the other way and drink too much water, possibly resulting in potentially life threatening water intoxication / hyponatremia. This is apparently a problem more for long-distance endurance activities that last more than three or four hours. To avoid hyponatremia, don’t force yourself to drink more than is comfortable, and drink a sports drink during prolonged exercise.

Healthy humans can acclimate themselves to high heat, but it takes time. If you’re already fit, this acclimation takes less time, but you should still ease yourself into it. I wrote about the physiological process of heat acclimation here.

Temperatures in the USA west should be more moderate the rest of the week.

Cupertino CA: Stevens Creek extension proposal needs your help

The city of Cupertino, CA will decide at their city council meeting on June 21, 2016 the fate of a proposed extension of the Stevens Creek Trail between Homestead and Stevens Creek Boulevard. City council has heard vocal and well-organized NIMBY opposition for this proposed bike route.

H/T to Martin Delson, a member of Friends of the Stevens Creek Trail which drafted the action alert and letter below:

(more…)